Home     About        FAQs        Feedback    Take Action    Downloads     MythWatch   Advanced Advocacy    Store   


Bookmark and Share          

 HUMANE MYTH GLOSSARY
Abolition
Animal advocacy
Animal husbandry
Animal protection
Animal rights
Animal welfare
Animal welfare industrial complex
Animal-using industries
Co-option
Commodification
Conflict of Interest
Conscience
Conscientious objection
Critical thinking
Cruelty-free
Disillusionment
Doctrine of necessary evil
Happy Meat
Hogwashing
Humane myth
Humane slaughter
Neocarnism
Non-participation and Non-cooperation
Non-violent social change
Open Rescue
Path of Conscience
Plant-based diet
Privilege of domination
Speciesism
Suffering
Sustainable
Utilitarianism
Values-based activism
Vegan
 

 

Resist Objectification

There is a difference between teaching and marketing, between persuasion and manipulation, between ethical leadership and demagoguery. The difference is the character of the intent toward others, whether there is a willingness to use methods that damage the well-being or distort the development of others as a means to an end. If we appeal to fear, ignorance, greed or self-interest, we may well advance our short term agenda, but the result is a society that is more fearful, ignorant, greedy and selfish. By refusing to look at any individual merely as a means to an end, we instead place our focus on methods that cultivate what is best in our own and others' nature, methods that lead people to the door of their own understanding and empowerment.

Demagogues try to con us into doing what they want. Ethical leaders inspire us to adhere to our values, to do right by others, to become ethical leaders ourselves.

See Commodification and Values-based Advocacy.